Blog Details

Many of these emissions fall under Scope 3 emissions, which come from supply chains, transportation, and other indirect sources. Addressing Scope 3 emissions is one of the most difficult challenges for businesses pursuing net-zero goals, making carbon credits a crucial tool. As regulations evolve globally, businesses that adopt high-quality carbon credits early may gain a competitive advantage. By collaborating with exchanges, marketplaces, and registries globally, Carbonplace streamlines carbon credit trading by removing the need for bilateral contracts between buyers and sellers. The platform only processes carbon credits verified by internationally recognised standards, ensuring trust and transparency.

Carbon markets also allow Big Pesticide corporations to increase their power over the food system. Companies like the Bayer-Monsanto corporation define carbon markets and offsets in a way that promotes their own genetically engineered seeds and pesticides. For example, pesticide companies assert that conventional no-till agriculture is a regenerative agriculture practice that increases soil carbon sequestration, but the latest science debunks this assumption. And yet, companies like Bayer are generating lucrative carbon credits by paying farmers to do conventional no-till, which depends heavily on Bayer’s proprietary genetically engineered seeds and toxic herbicides. Other major banks are also updating and increasing their climate commitment to stir up the transition.

• U.S. banks contributed $289 trillion to fossil fuel financing in 2024, accounting for about one-third of the global financing covered in the report.
• Europe’s largest bank HSBC updated its climate policy saying it will no longer offer new lending or capital market financing for new oil and gas fields or related projects.
• It will also be to ramp up its debt and equity capital markets to meet its climate goals.

Among the sectors leading this shift, the aviation industry is significantly increasing its reliance on carbon credits. The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) could add demand for 135–182 million tons of credits by 2026. Companies are the biggest buyers of carbon credits, using them to compensate for emissions they cannot yet eliminate.

Simplifying global carbon credit settlements: Carbonplace

Inadequate safeguards have led to violations of the rights of Indigenous Peoples and forest dwellers, https://chickenroadapp.net/ land rights conflicts, and environmental devastation. Carbon markets make land more valuable; corporations are incentivized to acquire land that can generate ostensible carbon offsets, even at the expense of these communities. Companies that buy carbon offsets, rather than reduce emissions, often reside in low-income communities and countries. Meanwhile, companies in wealthier communities, which already experience less pollution, are more likely to sell carbon offsets, meaning they’re reducing emissions and their own pollution. As the market evolves, investors may find opportunities in emerging sectors, particularly those prioritizing projects producing high-integrity carbon removal credits. Blue carbon, direct air capture, and afforestation are poised to attract more funding in the coming years.

U.S. Lithium Push: How Washington’s Bet on Lithium Americas Could Reshape the Global Market

The voluntary carbon market is undergoing rapid change, with investment playing a central role in shaping its future. Companies and investors are focusing on high-quality carbon removal projects, while new standards and technologies are improving market transparency. This growth is fueled by corporate sustainability goals and compliance tools such as CBAM and CORSIA. Businesses investing in reliable, high-integrity credits will better meet their sustainability goals.

Banks reverse course, increase fossil fuel investments in 2024: report

• Investors are increasingly interested in these projects due to their dual benefits of carbon sequestration and ecosystem restoration.
• Inadequate safeguards have led to violations of the rights of Indigenous Peoples and forest dwellers, land rights conflicts, and environmental devastation.
• While they have different amounts in climate commitment, all major banks share the same goal – speed up the transition to a sustainable, low carbon economy.
• It will also seek more partnerships with other major market players such as stock exchanges and carbon registries worldwide.
• The trading platform will connect buyers and sellers of carbon credits through the banks, namely.
• The platform only processes carbon credits verified by internationally recognised standards, ensuring trust and transparency.

With this technological solution, each bank can now offer its customers committed to decarbonize direct access to carbon credits to offset their footprint. Right now, carbon credits change hands bilaterally on a project-by-project basis as well as through exchanges. Nine global banks have invested a sum of $45 million in a new carbon credit platform to help ramp up transactions in the voluntary carbon market (VCM) and give the banks’ clients easier access to the market. JPMorgan, Bank of America and Citi represented the top three financiers of fossil fuel expansion in 2024 and the top three financiers of fossil fuels overall last year, according to the report. The trio of U.S. banks also are three of the four banks who increased fossil fuel financing by more than $12 billion last year, along with British bank Barclays. The release represents the 16th annual report documenting the largest banks’ commitments to financing fossil fuels, with financing for fossil fuel expansion also increasing in 2024 in another reverse of trends.

According to Abatable’s latest report, the voluntary carbon market (VCM) is growing rapidly, attracting $16.3 billion in funding in 2024. Green financing refers to the allocation of financial resources to projects that have a positive environmental impact. It encompasses a broad range of initiatives, including green bonds, sustainable investment funds, and climate-related insurance products. Green financing is crucial for achieving net-zero emissions, channeling capital into renewable energy, energy-efficient buildings, and cleaner transportation. While they have different amounts in climate commitment, all major banks share the same goal – speed up the transition to a sustainable, low carbon economy.

More Climate Commitment from US Major Banks

Blockchain-based carbon credit tracking and digital measurement, reporting, and verification (dMRV) tools are reducing the risks of fraud and double counting. These innovations allow real-time tracking of carbon credits, giving investors greater confidence in their authenticity and impact. New international standards, such as the Core Carbon Principles (CCPs) from the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (IC-VCM), are improving market transparency. For example, projects in Indonesia and Kenya are restoring degraded mangroves to generate blue carbon credits. Investors are increasingly interested in these projects due to their dual benefits of carbon sequestration and ecosystem restoration.

This is because carbon trading has exacerbated pollution hotspots in low-wealth communities and communities of color in the U.S. and throughout developing countries by allowing mega polluters to continue to pollute. Despite strong demand, carbon credit prices fell in 2024 due to an oversupply of older credits. However, removal credits, especially for afforestation and biochar, remained valuable. Biochar credits, for instance, traded between $200 and $1,200 per ton, reflecting their high demand and limited supply. A major trend in 2024 is the increasing investment in carbon removal projects rather than avoidance-based credits. Investors prefer projects that remove CO₂ from the air, such as direct air capture (DAC) and afforestation, because they provide measurable and permanent carbon reductions.

CORSIA-eligible credits are also gaining popularity, particularly among airlines looking to meet strict environmental regulations. As more industries adopt these high-quality standards, the voluntary carbon market is expected to become more reliable and impactful. However, newer REDD+ projects aligned with high-integrity standards are in higher demand. Investors are prioritizing credits that ensure long-term carbon storage rather than those that merely prevent emissions from increasing. Europe’s largest bank HSBC updated its climate policy saying it will no longer offer new lending or capital market financing for new oil and gas fields or related projects. Carbon markets perpetuate environmental racism, compromise human rights, and undermine healthy, sustainable, and resilient communities and food systems.

In April 2024, PNZ Carbon partnered with Carbonplace to distribute its carbon credits. These carbon credits were generated from a pilot with the Housing Associations’ Charitable Trust to retrofit social housing in the UK for greater energy efficiency. Last October, Britain’s largest domestic bank Lloyds Bank also announced the same intention.

Ensuring Quality and Trust in the Market

The $1 trillion climate pledge will involve green mortgages, sustainable financing structures, and financing for renewable energy firms. As per BloombergNEF’ projection, demand for carbon offset credits can grow 40x to 5.2 billion tons of CO2 in 2050. Demand for carbon offset credits is estimated to grow significantly as businesses are using them to achieve their net zero emissions targets.

With €22.5bn ($23.2bn) in assets under management, Triodos operates across Europe, offering accounts, loans, and cards to both individuals and businesses. Triodos focuses on funding impactful sectors like renewable energy, healthcare, fair trade, and social housing, investing only in projects that align with its sustainability and ethical standards. Part of its climate commitment, the major bank is also ramping up its equity capital investments after seeing success in this space. To date, it has invested £84 million in scaling up startups that innovate renewable energy storage solutions.

The trading network will use the $45m investment to scale up its platform’s infrastructure and grow its team. It will also seek more partnerships with other major market players such as stock exchanges and carbon registries worldwide. The top four U.S. banks — JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi and Wells Fargo — represented 21% of the global financing in the latest Banking on Climate Chaos report.

The covered banks were given the opportunity to see and confirm their data before its publication, according to the researchers. Carbon markets are markets in which polluters can buy carbon “credits,” or “offsets,” and claim that they reduced their carbon emissions. Another growing area is blue carbon credits, which come from coastal and marine ecosystems such as mangroves and seagrass. These environments store carbon at much higher rates than terrestrial forests and provide additional benefits like protecting biodiversity and supporting local communities.

What Is Carbon Dioxide Removal? Top Buyers and Sellers of CDR Credits in 2024

It will no longer provide direct financing to fossil fuel projects as part of its new climate policy. Investments in VCM projects grew to $10 billion last year, up from $7 billion in 2021, according to a report. While the volume of carbon credits bought as offsets (155 million) went down 4% from 2021, global supply jumped 2% (255 million). Carbonplace is a trading platform launched in 2021 to connect buyers and sellers of carbon credits through their respective banks. The company received its seed funding from its founding institutions that developed its technology.

It will be primarily to support firms that transition to a low-carbon economy. It will also be to ramp up its debt and equity capital markets to meet its climate goals. Yet, fossil fuel financing from the world’s biggest banks amounted to $4.6 trillion U.S. dollars in the 6 years since the 2015 Paris agreement.